Day r survival family matters11/11/2023 In July, 70 House Republicans - nearly one-third of their members - voted in favor of an amendment authored by Rep. ![]() This argument is losing ground in the House, where Speaker Kevin McCarthy has shown tepid support for Ukraine. ![]() Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., "There is no scenario based on human nature where appeasing one bad guy makes the other bad guy less aggressive." "If we appease Putin and pull the plug on Ukraine - and you don't think that makes China more aggressive? I think you're dead wrong," said Sen. help Ukraine and take on China at the same time, it has to. Most of the Senate's 49 Republicans, for now, appear to be allied with McConnell's neoconservative worldview that not only can the U.S. Senate Republicans disagree with House colleagues We'll take the lead on China, but we're not doing that," he told NPR. "I just think as a matter of our alliance with our European allies, we just need to level with them and say, listen, we'll provide the nuclear umbrella in Europe, but we need you to take the lead in the conventional defense of Europe. as he sees it: the rise and influence of China. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., said the focus on Ukraine is a distraction from the more urgent threat to the U.S. Mike Braun, R-Ind., who is running for governor next year.Īnother opponent who represents the younger, more populist wing of the GOP, Sen. "I agree that the Ukrainians hold the high moral ground and that Putin is a thug that invaded a country, but why should we be paying all the bills for something, especially in a powder keg area like that? I think, again, it comes down to that we just can't afford to do that in the long run," said Sen. Republican opposition rests on fiscal and foreign policy grounds. The opposition is driven by a sharply polarized electorate, with 71% of Republicans opposing new funding, compared to 62% of Democrats who said they support additional funding. His long-held opposition to essentially all foreign intervention once made Paul a fringe thinker in the party, but the rise of Trumpian, American First ideology now aligns Paul with a super-majority of Republican voters.Īn August CNN poll showed that a majority of Americans, 55%, say Congress should not authorize more funding for Ukraine. "There's no national security interest for us in Ukraine, and even if there were, it would be trumped by the fact that we have no money," said Sen. Congress has less than two weeks to avoid a shutdown at the end of the month, and McConnell wants to pass Ukraine aid on the same timeline, but there is little urgency among Republicans. The Ukraine money is now stuck in limbo as part of a complicated fight over spending that is pitting Republicans against one another and the House against the Senate. How Ukraine funding is tied to a shutdown threat Last month, President Biden asked Congress to approve an additional $24 billion as part of a broader $40 billion emergency spending package. With Democrats in near lockstep behind President Biden in support for Ukraine funding, McConnell's message is clearly directed at members of his own party who are ready to cut off aid. ![]() "Helping Ukraine retake its territory means weakening - weakening - one of America's biggest strategic adversaries without firing a shot," he said in a recent floor speech. In recent weeks, the Kentucky Republican has been making a concerted public case for continued material and financial aid to Ukraine to support its fight against the Russian invasion. this week to extend his hand in Washington, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell will be at the front of the line to grasp it. ![]() When Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy returns to the U.S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |